However, there are two other pieces of external evidence that may confirm that the author of the Gospel of Mark was a disciple of Peter.Justin Martyr quotes from Mark as being the memoirs of Peter (Dial. In Acts -40, Peter's speech serves as a good summary of the Gospel of Mark, "beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached." Finally, there was not an extremely strong motivation for the early church to attribute the second gospel to one obscure Mark, the disciple of Peter, instead of directly to an apostle.Tantric text dating from the 7th and 8th centuries onward, frequently recommend both drinking alcohol and eating meat and both are considered fit to offer to gods.
Some types of relative dating techniques include climate chronology, dendrochronology, ice core sampling, stratigraphy, and seriation.
The Buddha got his food either by going on alms rounds or by being invited to the houses of his supporters and in both cases he ate what he was given.
Before his enlightenment he had experimented with various diets including a meatless diet, but he eventually abandoned them believing that they did not contribute to spiritual development.underlines this point when it says that it is immorality that makes one impure (morally and spiritually), not the eating of meat.
It was not, however, in exact order that he related the sayings or deeds of Christ. But afterwards, as I said, he accompanied Peter, who accommodated his instructions to the necessities [of his hearers], but with no intention of giving a regular narrative of the Lord's sayings.
Wherefore Mark made no mistake in thus writing some things as he remembered them.